Value+of+Professional+Development+Activity

I related with what John Laws, Execuive Director for Technology, had to say the most. He says, "I think one of the largest national issues we face is our “assumption” that teachers can and will assimilate each wonderful new piece of technology we provide with little or no effort. The reality is with NCLB, AYP, State testing and RTI the teachers minds are focused on other issues." I completely agree with this thinking. Teachers often are expected to integrate something new they have learned about technology after having a brief explanation or attending a one day training session. This is too overwhelming for teachers. Certain areas should be focused on that are key, without trying to teach too many new concepts. P.D. instructors should focus on one important area. If they want to teach how to use interactive white boards, they should hold numerous sessions. They should then be available for additional help and support should be available for the teachers in the classrooms. If teachers have a mentor that can actually help them integrate the technology in the classroom or someone they can go to for help, they are much more likely to try new things. Just as we wouldn't expect a third grade student to miraculously understand multipication after one day, teachers shouldn't be expected to understand new technology with limited training. The key to P.D. is to offer substantial support and guidance to teachers that will allow them to grow as educators and engage their students in meaningful learning.